How do realists view the role of the state in international relations?

Realists view the role of the state in international relations as the primary actor and the central unit of analysis. According to realist political theory, the state is the most important actor in the international system, and its primary goal is to ensure its own survival and security. Realists believe that states are driven by self-interest and power-seeking behavior, and they prioritize national interests over moral or ethical considerations.

Realists argue that the state's main objective is to maximize its power and influence in order to protect its sovereignty and maintain a favorable position in the international arena. They emphasize the importance of military strength, economic capabilities, and strategic alliances to safeguard national security and advance national interests.

Realists also emphasize the anarchic nature of the international system, where there is no central authority to enforce rules or maintain order. In this context, states are seen as rational actors that engage in a constant struggle for power and security. Realists believe that states must be prepared to use force or coercion if necessary to protect their interests and maintain their position in the international hierarchy.

Furthermore, realists are skeptical of the effectiveness of international institutions and norms in shaping state behavior. They argue that states are primarily motivated by self-interest and are unlikely to voluntarily limit their power or sovereignty for the sake of international cooperation. Realists view international relations as a competitive and conflict-prone arena, where states must rely on their own capabilities and strategies to navigate the complexities of the global system.

In summary, realists view the role of the state in international relations as that of a self-interested actor driven by the pursuit of power and security. They prioritize national interests, emphasize military strength and strategic alliances, and are skeptical of the effectiveness of international institutions.