Explain the concept of sovereignty in political realism and idealism.

Political Theory Realism And Idealism Questions Long



39 Short 62 Medium 64 Long Answer Questions Question Index

Explain the concept of sovereignty in political realism and idealism.

In both political realism and idealism, the concept of sovereignty plays a significant role, albeit with different interpretations and implications.

In political realism, sovereignty is understood as the supreme authority and power of a state to govern itself without interference from external actors. Realists view sovereignty as a fundamental principle of international relations, emphasizing the importance of self-interest and the pursuit of power. According to realists, states are the primary actors in the international system, and their sovereignty allows them to act in their own national interest, even if it means disregarding moral or ethical considerations. Realists argue that the pursuit of power and self-interest is necessary to ensure the survival and security of the state in a competitive and anarchic international system.

On the other hand, in political idealism, sovereignty is seen as a means to achieve a more just and peaceful world order. Idealists believe that states should exercise their sovereignty responsibly and in accordance with moral and ethical principles. They argue that sovereignty should not be used as a shield to justify actions that violate human rights or undermine global cooperation. Idealists advocate for the establishment of international institutions and norms that can regulate state behavior and promote cooperation among nations. They believe that by adhering to principles of justice and morality, states can transcend their narrow self-interest and work towards the common good of humanity.

While realists and idealists differ in their understanding of sovereignty, both perspectives recognize its importance in shaping the behavior of states in the international arena. Realists prioritize the preservation of national interest and security, often at the expense of moral considerations, while idealists emphasize the need for states to exercise their sovereignty responsibly and in line with ethical principles. Ultimately, the concept of sovereignty serves as a fundamental building block in both realism and idealism, shaping their respective approaches to international relations.