What are the key differences between mixed methods research and political economy of conflict research?

Mixed Methods Research Questions



80 Short 69 Medium 46 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What are the key differences between mixed methods research and political economy of conflict research?

Mixed methods research and political economy of conflict research are two distinct approaches within the field of political science.

Mixed methods research refers to a research design that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of a particular phenomenon. It involves collecting and analyzing both numerical data (quantitative) and non-numerical data (qualitative) to provide a more holistic view of the research topic. The key characteristic of mixed methods research is its integration of different research methods to address research questions and generate more robust findings.

On the other hand, political economy of conflict research focuses specifically on the study of conflicts and their relationship with economic factors. It examines how economic factors, such as resource distribution, inequality, and economic policies, contribute to the emergence, escalation, and resolution of conflicts. Political economy of conflict research often employs quantitative methods, such as statistical analysis and econometric modeling, to analyze large datasets and identify patterns and correlations between economic variables and conflict dynamics.

Therefore, the key differences between mixed methods research and political economy of conflict research lie in their research focus and methodology. Mixed methods research is a broader approach that combines qualitative and quantitative methods to study various aspects of a research topic, while political economy of conflict research specifically focuses on the economic factors influencing conflicts and predominantly uses quantitative methods to analyze data.