What are the key differences between mixed methods research and international relations research?

Mixed Methods Research Questions



80 Short 69 Medium 46 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What are the key differences between mixed methods research and international relations research?

The key differences between mixed methods research and international relations research lie in their approach, focus, and methodology.

Mixed methods research is an approach that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods to gather and analyze data. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of a research problem by integrating different perspectives and types of data. Mixed methods research allows researchers to explore complex phenomena, capture multiple dimensions, and validate findings through triangulation.

On the other hand, international relations research focuses specifically on the study of interactions between states, non-state actors, and international organizations. It examines various aspects of global politics, such as diplomacy, conflict, cooperation, and international institutions. International relations research often employs qualitative methods, such as case studies, interviews, and content analysis, to analyze and interpret political phenomena.

In terms of methodology, mixed methods research combines both qualitative and quantitative techniques, allowing researchers to collect and analyze both numerical and textual data. This approach enables a more comprehensive understanding of the research problem and can provide richer insights. In contrast, international relations research primarily relies on qualitative methods, emphasizing in-depth analysis, interpretation, and contextual understanding.

Overall, while mixed methods research is a broader approach that can be applied to various disciplines, international relations research is a specific field within political science that focuses on the study of global politics and interactions between actors in the international system.