What are the key differences between mixed methods research and international public policy research?

Mixed Methods Research Questions



80 Short 69 Medium 46 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What are the key differences between mixed methods research and international public policy research?

Mixed methods research and international public policy research are two distinct approaches within the field of political science.

Mixed methods research refers to a research design that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of a research question. It involves collecting and analyzing both numerical data (quantitative) and non-numerical data (qualitative) to provide a more holistic view of the topic under investigation. The key characteristic of mixed methods research is its integration of different research methods to complement and enhance each other.

On the other hand, international public policy research focuses specifically on the study of public policies in the context of international relations. It examines how policies are formulated, implemented, and evaluated at the international level, considering the interactions between different actors, such as states, international organizations, and non-state actors. International public policy research often employs qualitative research methods, such as case studies, interviews, and document analysis, to explore the complexities and nuances of policy-making in the global arena.

Therefore, the key differences between mixed methods research and international public policy research lie in their focus and methodology. Mixed methods research is a broader approach that can be applied to various research topics, while international public policy research is specifically concerned with the study of policies in the international context. Additionally, mixed methods research integrates both qualitative and quantitative methods, whereas international public policy research primarily relies on qualitative methods.