What are the key differences between mixed methods research and international political economy research?

Mixed Methods Research Questions



80 Short 69 Medium 46 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What are the key differences between mixed methods research and international political economy research?

Mixed methods research and international political economy research are two distinct approaches within the field of political science.

Mixed methods research refers to a research design that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of a research question. It involves collecting and analyzing both numerical data (quantitative) and non-numerical data (qualitative) to provide a more holistic view of the topic under investigation. The key characteristic of mixed methods research is its integration of different research methods to address research questions from multiple angles.

On the other hand, international political economy research focuses specifically on the study of the interactions between politics and economics at the international level. It examines how political factors, such as power dynamics, institutions, and policies, shape economic outcomes and vice versa. International political economy research often employs qualitative methods, such as case studies, interviews, and content analysis, to analyze complex political and economic phenomena.

The key differences between mixed methods research and international political economy research lie in their focus and methodology. While mixed methods research is a research design that can be applied to various topics, international political economy research specifically examines the intersection of politics and economics in the international context. Additionally, mixed methods research combines both qualitative and quantitative methods, whereas international political economy research primarily relies on qualitative methods to analyze political and economic phenomena.