What are the key differences between mixed methods research and evaluative research?

Mixed Methods Research Questions



80 Short 69 Medium 46 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What are the key differences between mixed methods research and evaluative research?

Mixed methods research and evaluative research are two distinct approaches in the field of political science.

Mixed methods research refers to a research design that combines both qualitative and quantitative methods in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of a research problem. It involves collecting and analyzing both numerical data (quantitative) and non-numerical data (qualitative) to address research questions. The key characteristic of mixed methods research is its integration of different types of data and methods, allowing for a more holistic and nuanced analysis.

On the other hand, evaluative research focuses specifically on assessing the effectiveness or value of a particular program, policy, or intervention. It aims to determine the extent to which the program or policy has achieved its intended outcomes and impacts. Evaluative research often employs quantitative methods, such as surveys or experiments, to collect data and measure the success or failure of the program. It is primarily concerned with making judgments and recommendations based on the evaluation findings.

In summary, the key differences between mixed methods research and evaluative research lie in their objectives and approaches. Mixed methods research seeks to understand a research problem comprehensively by integrating qualitative and quantitative data, while evaluative research focuses on assessing the effectiveness or value of a specific program or policy.