International Relations Humanitarian Interventions Questions
The concept of 'humanitarian intervention non-violation of international jurisprudence' in humanitarian interventions refers to the idea that certain actions taken by states or international organizations to protect human rights and prevent or alleviate humanitarian crises can be justified under international law, even if they involve a violation of the principle of non-intervention in the internal affairs of sovereign states. This concept argues that in exceptional circumstances, when a state is unable or unwilling to protect its own population from grave human rights abuses, the international community has a responsibility to intervene to prevent further harm. While intervention may involve the use of force, it is argued that it is justified under international law if it is conducted with the primary purpose of protecting human rights and is carried out in accordance with certain legal principles, such as proportionality and necessity. However, the concept of humanitarian intervention non-violation of international jurisprudence remains a subject of debate and interpretation among scholars and practitioners of international relations.