What are the advantages of the single transferable vote electoral system?

Electoral Systems Questions



80 Short 80 Medium 47 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What are the advantages of the single transferable vote electoral system?

The single transferable vote (STV) electoral system has several advantages:

1. Proportional representation: STV ensures that the distribution of seats in a legislative body reflects the proportion of votes received by each political party or candidate. This promotes fair representation and allows for a diverse range of voices to be heard.

2. Voter choice: STV allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, giving them more control over their vote. This system encourages voters to support their preferred candidates without fear of wasting their vote, as their subsequent preferences can still be counted.

3. Reduced wasted votes: STV minimizes wasted votes by transferring surplus votes from elected candidates to other candidates based on voters' preferences. This ensures that votes are not wasted on candidates who have already secured enough support to win.

4. Increased competition: STV encourages political parties to field multiple candidates in a constituency, leading to increased competition and a wider range of choices for voters. This can foster a more vibrant and competitive political environment.

5. Minority representation: STV provides opportunities for minority groups to be represented in the legislature. By allowing voters to support candidates from different parties or independent candidates, STV can help ensure that minority voices are heard and represented.

6. Consensus building: STV promotes consensus building and cooperation among political parties. Candidates often need to appeal to a broader range of voters to secure the necessary quota of votes, which can encourage politicians to work together and find common ground.

Overall, the advantages of the single transferable vote electoral system include proportional representation, voter choice, reduced wasted votes, increased competition, minority representation, and consensus building.