How does Scientific Realism address the problem of scientific realism and naturalism?

Scientific Realism is a philosophical position that asserts the existence of an external reality that is independent of our perceptions and theories, and that scientific theories aim to provide accurate descriptions and explanations of this reality. It holds that scientific theories should be understood as approximately true representations of the world, and that the success of science in making accurate predictions and technological advancements supports the claim that our scientific theories are reliable.

When it comes to addressing the problem of scientific realism and naturalism, Scientific Realism takes a stance that is compatible with naturalism. Naturalism is the philosophical position that the natural world is all that exists and that everything can be explained by natural causes and laws, without the need for supernatural or metaphysical entities.

Scientific Realism addresses the problem by arguing that scientific theories are the most reliable means we have for understanding the natural world. It acknowledges that our scientific theories are fallible and subject to revision, but it maintains that they provide the best available explanations based on empirical evidence and rigorous scientific methods.

Scientific Realism also recognizes the provisional nature of scientific knowledge, understanding that our theories are always subject to further investigation and potential revision. However, it emphasizes that this does not undermine the overall reliability and success of science in uncovering truths about the natural world.

In this way, Scientific Realism reconciles the problem of scientific realism and naturalism by asserting that scientific theories are naturalistic explanations of the world, grounded in empirical evidence and subject to ongoing scrutiny and refinement. It maintains that science provides us with the most accurate and reliable understanding of the natural world, while also acknowledging the limitations and potential for revision inherent in scientific inquiry.