How does Scientific Realism address the problem of scientific progress?

Scientific Realism addresses the problem of scientific progress by asserting that scientific theories aim to provide an accurate representation of the world, and that these theories can be progressively improved over time through empirical evidence and experimentation. According to Scientific Realism, scientific progress occurs when new theories are developed that better explain and predict phenomena, replacing older theories that are found to be inadequate or incomplete.

Scientific Realism acknowledges that scientific knowledge is not fixed or absolute, but rather evolves as new evidence and observations are gathered. It recognizes that scientific theories are fallible and subject to revision, but maintains that they can still provide reliable and objective knowledge about the natural world.

One way Scientific Realism addresses the problem of scientific progress is by emphasizing the importance of empirical evidence. It argues that scientific theories should be evaluated based on their ability to explain and predict observable phenomena, and that theories supported by a large body of empirical evidence are more likely to be true.

Additionally, Scientific Realism highlights the role of experimentation and observation in refining scientific theories. It recognizes that scientific progress often involves testing hypotheses, conducting experiments, and gathering data to confirm or refute theories. Through this process, theories can be modified or discarded based on the evidence obtained, leading to a more accurate understanding of the natural world.

Overall, Scientific Realism provides a framework for understanding scientific progress by emphasizing the importance of empirical evidence, experimentation, and the continuous refinement of theories. It acknowledges the fallibility of scientific knowledge while maintaining that it can still provide reliable and objective insights into the workings of the universe.