Explain the concept of implicature in Levinson's pragmatics.

Philosophy Pragmatics Questions Long



19 Short 80 Medium 47 Long Answer Questions Question Index

Explain the concept of implicature in Levinson's pragmatics.

In Levinson's pragmatics, implicature refers to the process of deriving meaning that goes beyond the literal interpretation of an utterance. It involves understanding the implied meaning or intention behind a speaker's words, which may not be explicitly stated.

Implicature is based on the idea that communication involves more than just the words used; it also involves the shared knowledge, context, and assumptions between the speaker and the listener. When a speaker makes an utterance, they often rely on the listener's ability to infer the intended meaning based on this shared knowledge.

Levinson distinguishes between two types of implicature: conventional implicature and conversational implicature. Conventional implicature refers to the meaning that is conventionally associated with certain words or phrases. For example, when someone says "John is a bachelor," the conventional implicature is that John is an unmarried man.

Conversational implicature, on the other hand, is derived from the context and the speaker's intentions. It involves making inferences based on what is said, as well as what is not said. For instance, if someone says "I have a lot of work to do," the conversational implicature may be that they are too busy to engage in a particular activity.

Grice's Cooperative Principle is central to Levinson's understanding of implicature. According to this principle, speakers and listeners are expected to cooperate in the act of communication, with the assumption that both parties will make their contributions relevant, informative, truthful, and clear. When a speaker violates this principle, it often leads to implicatures.

Levinson also introduces the concept of maxims, which are guidelines that speakers and listeners follow to ensure effective communication. These maxims include the maxim of quantity (providing enough information), the maxim of quality (being truthful), the maxim of relation (being relevant), and the maxim of manner (being clear and avoiding ambiguity). When these maxims are violated, implicatures can arise.

Overall, implicature in Levinson's pragmatics highlights the importance of context, shared knowledge, and the cooperative nature of communication. It emphasizes that meaning is not solely derived from the literal interpretation of words, but also from the inferences made based on the speaker's intentions and the context in which the communication takes place.