Philosophy Metaethics Questions Medium
Moral intuition subjectivism is a metaethical theory that posits that moral judgments are ultimately based on individual subjective intuitions or feelings. According to this view, moral truths are not objective or universal but rather depend on the personal beliefs and emotions of each individual.
Proponents of moral intuition subjectivism argue that moral judgments are not derived from reason or external sources, but rather arise from an individual's immediate emotional response to a particular situation or action. These intuitions are seen as the foundation of moral judgments, and they vary from person to person.
This theory suggests that there are no objective moral facts or principles that exist independently of human subjectivity. Instead, moral judgments are considered to be expressions of personal preferences or attitudes. What is morally right or wrong is determined by an individual's subjective intuition or feeling about a particular situation.
Critics of moral intuition subjectivism argue that it leads to moral relativism, as there is no objective standard by which to evaluate conflicting moral intuitions. Additionally, it is often criticized for its lack of justification or rational basis for moral judgments. Without a clear and objective framework, moral intuition subjectivism can be seen as arbitrary and subjective.
Overall, moral intuition subjectivism is a metaethical theory that emphasizes the role of individual subjective intuitions or feelings in determining moral judgments. It challenges the idea of objective moral truths and instead focuses on the diversity and subjectivity of moral beliefs and attitudes.