Philosophy Metaethics Questions Medium
Moral intuition internalism is a position within metaethics that asserts that moral judgments are based on internal mental states or intuitions. According to this view, moral truths are not dependent on external factors such as cultural norms or societal conventions, but rather on the individual's internal moral intuitions.
Internalism holds that moral judgments are not simply subjective or arbitrary, but rather grounded in the individual's own moral intuitions or emotions. These intuitions are seen as a reliable source of moral knowledge, providing a direct and immediate understanding of what is morally right or wrong.
Proponents of moral intuition internalism argue that moral judgments are not solely based on reasoning or external factors, but also involve an immediate and intuitive response to moral situations. They believe that individuals possess an innate moral sense or conscience that guides their moral judgments.
However, it is important to note that moral intuition internalism does not claim that all moral intuitions are infallible or universally valid. Critics argue that moral intuitions can be influenced by various factors such as personal biases, cultural conditioning, or emotional states, which may lead to conflicting intuitions among different individuals.
In summary, moral intuition internalism is the position that moral judgments are based on internal moral intuitions or emotions, which are seen as a reliable source of moral knowledge. It emphasizes the importance of individual moral intuitions in determining what is morally right or wrong, while acknowledging the potential limitations and biases that can affect these intuitions.