Philosophy Metaethics Questions Medium
Moral intuition expressivism is a metaethical theory that seeks to explain the nature of moral judgments and the role of moral intuitions in our moral reasoning. It posits that moral judgments are not based on objective facts or universal principles, but rather on our individual and subjective moral intuitions.
According to moral intuition expressivism, moral judgments are not statements of fact about the world, but rather expressions of our personal attitudes, emotions, or preferences. These judgments are seen as a way of expressing our moral intuitions or gut feelings about what is right or wrong, good or bad.
This theory suggests that moral intuitions are a fundamental part of our moral decision-making process. They are immediate and instinctive responses to moral situations, often arising from our upbringing, cultural influences, personal experiences, and emotional responses. Moral intuitions are considered to be non-rational, in the sense that they are not based on logical reasoning or objective evidence.
Moral intuition expressivism also emphasizes the role of moral disagreement. It acknowledges that individuals can have different moral intuitions, leading to conflicting moral judgments. This theory does not aim to resolve these disagreements by appealing to objective moral truths, but rather recognizes and respects the diversity of moral intuitions among individuals.
Overall, moral intuition expressivism suggests that moral judgments are subjective expressions of our personal moral intuitions, rather than objective statements about the world. It highlights the importance of understanding and acknowledging the role of intuition in our moral reasoning, while recognizing the potential for moral disagreement based on differing intuitions.