What is moral intuition coherentism?

Moral intuition coherentism is a metaethical theory that seeks to explain the nature of moral knowledge and justification. It posits that moral beliefs are justified through a coherent network of moral intuitions.

According to moral intuition coherentism, moral intuitions are immediate, non-inferential, and self-evident beliefs about moral truths. These intuitions serve as the foundation for our moral knowledge and guide our moral judgments. They are considered to be reliable and trustworthy sources of moral knowledge.

In this framework, moral beliefs are justified when they cohere with our network of moral intuitions. Coherence refers to the consistency and logical compatibility of our moral beliefs with each other and with our intuitions. If a moral belief aligns with our existing network of intuitions, it is considered justified. On the other hand, if a belief contradicts or conflicts with our intuitions, it is deemed unjustified.

Moral intuition coherentism emphasizes the importance of reflective equilibrium, which is the process of continuously adjusting our moral beliefs and intuitions to achieve a coherent and consistent moral framework. This involves revising our intuitions or moral beliefs when they are found to be in conflict with each other or with new evidence.

Critics of moral intuition coherentism argue that it relies heavily on subjective intuitions, which can vary among individuals and cultures. They also question the reliability and objectivity of moral intuitions as a basis for moral knowledge. Additionally, some argue that this theory does not provide a clear method for resolving conflicts between intuitions or determining which intuitions should be given more weight.

Overall, moral intuition coherentism offers a perspective on moral knowledge and justification that emphasizes the role of moral intuitions and coherence. It provides a framework for understanding how moral beliefs can be justified through a network of intuitions, although it is not without its criticisms and challenges.