Philosophy Distributive Justice Questions Medium
Distributive justice and corrective justice are two distinct concepts within the field of philosophy, specifically in the realm of justice. While both aim to address fairness and equality, they differ in their focus and application.
Distributive justice primarily concerns the fair distribution of resources, opportunities, and benefits within a society. It focuses on how goods and burdens should be allocated among individuals or groups. The main question in distributive justice is how to distribute these resources in a way that is considered fair and just. This concept often involves examining principles such as equality, need, merit, and contribution. Distributive justice seeks to create a just society by ensuring that everyone has access to basic necessities, opportunities, and a fair share of resources.
On the other hand, corrective justice is concerned with rectifying or correcting injustices that have occurred. It deals with the resolution of disputes and the restoration of balance or fairness after a harm or wrongdoing has taken place. Corrective justice aims to restore the harmed party to their original state or provide compensation for the harm suffered. It focuses on the idea of retribution, punishment, and restoring the balance of power between the parties involved. Corrective justice is often associated with legal systems and the idea of holding individuals accountable for their actions.
In summary, the main difference between distributive justice and corrective justice lies in their focus and application. Distributive justice deals with the fair distribution of resources and opportunities within a society, while corrective justice focuses on rectifying injustices and restoring balance after a harm has occurred. Both concepts are essential in the pursuit of a just society, but they address different aspects of justice.