What is the difference between consequentialism and moral subjectivism?

Philosophy Consequentialism Questions



40 Short 55 Medium 54 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What is the difference between consequentialism and moral subjectivism?

Consequentialism and moral subjectivism are two distinct ethical theories that differ in their approach to determining what is morally right or wrong.

Consequentialism is an ethical theory that focuses on the consequences or outcomes of actions. According to consequentialism, the morality of an action is determined solely by its consequences. The right action is the one that produces the greatest overall amount of happiness or utility for the greatest number of people. Consequentialism does not consider the intentions or motives behind an action, but rather focuses on the end result.

On the other hand, moral subjectivism is an ethical theory that emphasizes individual subjectivity in determining what is morally right or wrong. According to moral subjectivism, morality is subjective and varies from person to person. Each individual has their own personal beliefs and values, and what is morally right or wrong is determined by their own subjective perspective. Moral subjectivism does not rely on objective standards or universal principles, but rather on personal opinions and preferences.

In summary, the main difference between consequentialism and moral subjectivism lies in their approach to determining morality. Consequentialism focuses on the consequences of actions, while moral subjectivism emphasizes individual subjectivity in determining what is morally right or wrong.