Relative Clauses Questions Long
In relative clauses of concession, the concept of 'omission' refers to the omission or exclusion of certain words or phrases that are typically present in other types of relative clauses. This omission is done to convey a sense of contrast or concession between the main clause and the relative clause.
In relative clauses of concession, the relative pronoun 'who', 'which', 'that', or 'whose' is often omitted. This omission is common when the relative pronoun is the subject of the relative clause and is followed by a verb. For example:
- The man (who/that) I met yesterday was very friendly.
- The book (which/that) I read last week was fascinating.
In these examples, the relative pronouns 'who' and 'which' are omitted, and the sentences still convey the intended meaning. The omission of the relative pronoun creates a sense of concession or contrast between the main clause and the relative clause.
Additionally, the omission of the relative pronoun is also common when it is followed by a preposition. For example:
- The house (which/that) I live in is very old.
- The car (that/which) he drove off in was brand new.
In these examples, the relative pronouns 'which' and 'that' are omitted, and the sentences still make sense. The omission of the relative pronoun followed by a preposition creates a sense of concession or contrast between the main clause and the relative clause.
It is important to note that the omission of the relative pronoun is not always possible or appropriate. It depends on the specific context and the grammatical structure of the sentence. In some cases, the relative pronoun cannot be omitted without changing the meaning or causing confusion. Therefore, it is essential to consider the clarity and coherence of the sentence when deciding whether to omit the relative pronoun in relative clauses of concession.