What is the impact of using the passive voice in journalism?

Active Passive Voice Questions Medium



80 Short 65 Medium 49 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What is the impact of using the passive voice in journalism?

The impact of using the passive voice in journalism can vary depending on the context and purpose of the article. However, there are a few general effects that can be observed.

Firstly, the passive voice can create a sense of objectivity and impartiality in journalism. By focusing on the action rather than the subject, it allows the journalist to present information without explicitly stating who is responsible. This can be particularly useful when reporting on controversial or sensitive topics, as it avoids assigning blame or making assumptions.

On the other hand, the passive voice can also lead to a lack of clarity and accountability in journalism. By omitting the subject, it can make it difficult for readers to identify who is responsible for the actions being described. This can potentially undermine the credibility of the article and leave readers with unanswered questions.

Additionally, the passive voice can sometimes be used to manipulate or distort information in journalism. By shifting the focus away from the subject, it can be used to downplay or hide the true significance of certain events or actions. This can be a concern when journalists are trying to present a balanced and accurate account of events.

Overall, the impact of using the passive voice in journalism is a complex issue that depends on various factors. While it can provide objectivity and impartiality, it can also lead to a lack of clarity and accountability. Journalists should carefully consider the context and purpose of their articles when deciding whether to use the passive voice or not.