What is the difference between a constant and an increasing opportunity cost?

Economics Production Possibility Frontier Questions Medium



29 Short 51 Medium 38 Long Answer Questions Question Index

What is the difference between a constant and an increasing opportunity cost?

In economics, the production possibility frontier (PPF) represents the maximum combination of goods and services that an economy can produce given its available resources and technology. The concept of opportunity cost is central to understanding the PPF.

The difference between a constant and an increasing opportunity cost lies in how the resources are allocated and the trade-offs that occur when producing different goods or services.

1. Constant Opportunity Cost:
When an economy has a constant opportunity cost, it means that the trade-off between producing one good and another remains the same throughout the production process. In other words, the resources used to produce one good can be easily switched to produce another good without any significant increase in cost. This implies that the PPF is a straight line, indicating a constant rate of trade-off between the two goods.

For example, let's consider an economy that produces only two goods: cars and computers. If the opportunity cost of producing one car is always two computers, regardless of the quantity produced, then the economy has a constant opportunity cost. This means that for every car produced, two computers must be given up.

2. Increasing Opportunity Cost:
On the other hand, when an economy faces increasing opportunity cost, it means that the trade-off between producing one good and another becomes more costly as more of a particular good is produced. In this case, the resources used to produce one good are not easily adaptable to produce another good, resulting in a higher opportunity cost. The PPF is concave (curved) in shape, indicating an increasing rate of trade-off between the two goods.

For instance, let's consider an economy that produces wheat and cotton. Initially, the economy may have abundant fertile land suitable for both crops. However, as more wheat is produced, the best land is utilized first, and to produce additional units of wheat, less fertile land must be used, resulting in a decrease in productivity. This implies that the opportunity cost of producing more wheat increases, as more cotton must be given up to produce each additional unit of wheat.

In summary, the key difference between constant and increasing opportunity cost lies in the rate at which resources can be switched between the production of different goods. A constant opportunity cost implies a straight-line PPF, indicating a constant trade-off, while an increasing opportunity cost implies a concave PPF, indicating an increasing trade-off as more of a particular good is produced.