How does comparative advantage differ from absolute advantage?

Economics Comparative Advantage Questions



80 Short 79 Medium 28 Long Answer Questions Question Index

How does comparative advantage differ from absolute advantage?

Comparative advantage differs from absolute advantage in that comparative advantage focuses on the opportunity cost of producing a good or service, while absolute advantage looks at the overall productivity or efficiency of producing a good or service.

In comparative advantage, a country or individual has a comparative advantage in producing a good or service if they can produce it at a lower opportunity cost compared to others. This means that they give up less of other goods or services to produce a unit of the good or service in question.

On the other hand, absolute advantage refers to the ability of a country or individual to produce a good or service using fewer resources or inputs compared to others. It is a measure of overall productivity or efficiency in production.

Comparative advantage is based on the concept of opportunity cost, which considers the trade-offs involved in producing different goods or services. It allows countries or individuals to specialize in producing goods or services in which they have a lower opportunity cost, and then trade with others to obtain goods or services in which they have a higher opportunity cost. This leads to mutually beneficial trade and overall efficiency in resource allocation.

In contrast, absolute advantage does not consider opportunity cost or trade-offs. It simply looks at the ability to produce more output with the same amount of inputs or resources. While absolute advantage can still lead to specialization and trade, it may not necessarily result in the most efficient allocation of resources.