Explain the trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule for numerical integration. Compare their accuracy.

Numerical Analysis Questions Long



75 Short 69 Medium 40 Long Answer Questions Question Index

Explain the trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule for numerical integration. Compare their accuracy.

The trapezoidal rule and Simpson's rule are both numerical methods used for approximating definite integrals. They are commonly employed in numerical analysis to estimate the value of an integral when the function being integrated is difficult or impossible to integrate analytically.

The trapezoidal rule approximates the integral by dividing the interval of integration into small trapezoids and summing up their areas. The formula for the trapezoidal rule is given by:

∫[a,b] f(x) dx ≈ (h/2) * [f(a) + 2f(x1) + 2f(x2) + ... + 2f(xn-1) + f(b)]

where h is the width of each subinterval and n is the number of subintervals. The trapezoidal rule assumes that the function being integrated is linear between each pair of consecutive points.

On the other hand, Simpson's rule approximates the integral by fitting a parabolic curve to three consecutive points and integrating under the curve. The formula for Simpson's rule is given by:

∫[a,b] f(x) dx ≈ (h/3) * [f(a) + 4f(x1) + 2f(x2) + 4f(x3) + ... + 2f(xn-2) + 4f(xn-1) + f(b)]

where h is the width of each subinterval and n is the number of subintervals. Simpson's rule assumes that the function being integrated is a quadratic polynomial between each set of three consecutive points.

In terms of accuracy, Simpson's rule generally provides a more accurate approximation compared to the trapezoidal rule. This is because Simpson's rule takes into account the curvature of the function by fitting a parabolic curve, while the trapezoidal rule assumes a linear approximation. As a result, Simpson's rule can provide a more precise estimation for functions that are not linear.

The error in both methods depends on the number of subintervals used. The trapezoidal rule has an error that decreases with the square of the number of subintervals, while Simpson's rule has an error that decreases with the fourth power of the number of subintervals. This means that Simpson's rule converges to the exact value of the integral faster than the trapezoidal rule as the number of subintervals increases.

However, it is important to note that the accuracy of both methods is limited by the smoothness of the function being integrated. If the function has discontinuities or sharp changes, both methods may provide inaccurate results. In such cases, more advanced numerical integration techniques may be required.